Romeo two families so much so that

Romeo and Juliet, is a story of two young lovers, whose love was destined for destruction.

They did not imagine that their love would lead to the tragedies that it did. These two young people did nothing wrong except fall in love. Three aspects of their destruction included the feud between the two families, the nurse and her betrayal of Juliet and the most important aspect of all, fate. The feud between the two families was one factor that contributed to the love of Romeo and Juliet being destined for destruction.”From ancient grudge break to new mutiny”.(Romeo & Juliet, Prologue, pg.2 l.3)The two families, Montagues and Capulets, had many problems.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

There was hate between the two families so much so that even the servants hated each other. This feud would have caused many problems for Romeo and Juliet: These two young lovers knew this and this is why they kept their marriage a secret. If their parents discovered their secret, they would have made their children’s lives miserable. Romeo and Juliet would not have been able to see each other. Both of these families were very stubborn and there was hardly any thing that would have made them become friends. In the prologue we learn that the only way the “strife” could be ended was by the deaths of Romeo and Juliet.

“Doth with their death bury their parent’s strife”.(Romeo ; Juliet, Prologue, l.8)Neither the Montagues or the Capulets would have accepted the marriage. Keeping the marriage a secret caused Romeo and Juliet to turn to other people for help. Sometimes these people gave them the wrong advice or just betrayed them.

The Nurse was one of these characters who betrayed the young couple. The Nurse who was also Juliet’s friend turned against her at a very crucial time. The Nurse told Juliet that it would be best if she married Paris.”I think it best you married with the county”.(Romeo & Juliet, pg.

101, III, v, l.219)This betrayal by the Nurse left Juliet alone. She was a wise young woman but it still would have been beneficial for her to have the help of the Nurse. Juliet was left on her own to make some very important decisions. I believe that if the Nurse had been around to help Juliet things may have turned out differently. Juliet had no one to turn to and ask for help.

She could not have gone to her parents because they would not have understood. The Nurse was supposed to be one of Juliet’s best friends. Now when it was important for Juliet to have someone there, for her she was betrayed.

When considering the destruction of Romeo and Juliet the most sifnificant fact you must think about is fate. Fate, above all, destroyed Romeo and Juliet. Many instances in the play reveals that the love of Romeo and Juliet would end in death.”A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life”.(Romeo ; Juliet,pg.2, Prologue, l.6)From the very beginning it is evident that they were destined by the stars to bad fortune. Some people may think that there is no way to control fate or change what is in the stars.

It could be that the love of Romeo and Juliet was destined for death so that their parent’s feud would be over. Also, in the prologue it states that the dreadful course of their love was destined for death.”The fearful passage of their death marked love”.(Romeo & Juliet, pg.2, Prologue, l.9) Both of these quotes show us that the love of these two was destined to end tragically.

The masquerade party was above all the most important aspect of fate. The fact that Romeo was wearing a mask and his face was hidden allowed juliet to fall in love with him before she saw who it was. If Juliet had known who Romeo was she would probably have not fallen in love with him.

Fate could not have been changed whatever was meant to be would happen and no one could change that. In conclusion, from the very beginning, the love of Romeo and Juliet was destined to be destroyed. It is tragic that both these people had to die. There were circumstances throughout the course

SHAKESPEARE’S historical play) for every season. The

SHAKESPEARE’S relationship to the Lord Chamberlain’s Men seems to have involved the production of a couple of new plays every year. Broadly speaking, he provided them with a comedy and a tragedy (or historical play) for every season. The companion pieces to the two lyrical comedies are two no less lyrical tragedies, Romeo and Juliet and Richard II. While the detailed chronology of the four pieces is still unclear, it is generally agreed that they form a distinct group in Shakespeare’s canon.

The title page of the first quarto edition of Romeo and Juliet (1597) describes the play as ‘An excellent conceited tragedy’. Two years later, the Lord Chamberlain’s Men released their ‘newly corrected, augmented, and amended’ text, calling it a ‘most excellent and lamentable tragedy’. These qualifying terms prepare us for much in the play. ‘Lamentable’ had been the label fixed to Titus Andronicus, while ‘conceited’ (i.e.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

‘witty’) connects the piece with Love’s Labour’s Lost – a play that also appeared in an ‘official’ edition in 1599.The play is one of Shakespeare’s most ambitious and unambiguous attempts to join the immortals, and as such seems at first blush very different from the demythologising of Love’s Labour’s Lost and the open-endedness of the Dream. It is introduced by a chorus, and wrapped up by a judgemental speech from a duke. And it sets out to transform its youthful lovers into mythical, ’star-crossed’ figures, fit to rank with all the celebrated pairs of tragic lovers throughout literary history. In particular, Shakespeare was seeking to join the company of English practitioners in this mode, most notably Chaucer, whose Troilus and Criseyde was then regarded as the finest poem yet written in the language, and Sidney, whose tragicomic Astrophil and Stella was beginning to rival the celebrity of Chaucer’s creation.But Shakespeare was to take a love tragedy and put it on a public stage; and it was to be a story that dealt not with lofty figures from the distant past or ancient epic, but with two adolescents in a recognisably modern city-state. Like Sidney’s sequence, and like the two brie comedies of these years, Romeo and Juliet hovers tantalisingly between fiction and actuality – in keeping with classical prescriptions, it is a tragedy based on a story that was believed to be true.

In its ultimate Italian source, a novel by Masuccio Salernitano (published in 1576), the story of the lovers, Mariotto and Gianozza, is said to have taken place during the author’s lifetime. When Luigi da Porta published his version in 1530, with the names changed to Romeo and Giulietta, and their families identified as the Montecchi and Capelletti, he claimed that his tale was verifiable fact (although the historical Capelletti came from Cremona, and da Porta’s coupling of them was based on a very literal reading of a line in Dante). Corte, in his history of Verona (1594) accepted da Porta’s word and told the story as an illustration of the civil dissent of the time. To this day, tourists to Verona are directed to the major sites featured in the tragic story.Bibliography:


I'm Morris!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out